But insofar as Clifford's main thesis continues to be influential to this day, the duty in question is Love podcasts or audiobooks? Different propositions would necessarily require different thresholds of evidence in order to rationally hold a belief. [wp[\~aFylQkc2-kKyG2~%:pW]"[zdh]]c9 y' ~o?A:Z00*'p$>U,s,, Similarly, when it comes to epistemic ethics, were all (im)moral., That said, as there is moral imperative for us to work to be increasingly moral though we will always be (im)moral, so there is moral imperative for us to become increasingly responsible and epistemically moral. Modern revelation also tells Latter-day Saints to be subject to the laws of the land in which they live. The paper also made clear my great skepticism of Ethics classes, but that shouldnt be conflated with a disdain for all ethics (though Im admittedly skeptical of general ethics). That said, we dont always realize when we mispresent those we disagree with, overlook ideas that could prove us wrong, and so onthe ways we ideology preserve are sometimes subconscious, unintentional, and subtle. Clifford's overarching idea is immensely important, and I would like to expand on it here to claim that a failure to "think well" is an example of epistemic irresponsibility and immorality. This is a very short list intended only to highlight ways in which we can cultivate epistemic responsibility. However, if epistemic responsibility is a concern of ours, and we realize that just because someone happens to be correct, it doesnt follow that the person is necessarily epistemically responsible about being correct, we can start seeing America very differently. Henderson, Jeremy When we know something is true and disregard it, or when we believe in something without sufficient evidence, according to Clifford, we act immorally. The paper also made clear my great skepticism of Ethics classes, but that shouldnt be conflated with a disdain for all ethics (though Im admittedly skeptical of general ethics). For Clifford, all of us have a burden of "epistemic responsibility" that we must bear well; otherwise, we fail to live the moral life. Clifford, Pluralism, and the Morality of Philosophy. [7], For many years, scholars and apologists have been exploring and documenting evidences for belief in the scriptures as well as answering criticism of the doctrine, history, and practice of the Church so as to make sure that no ones belief is impeded in the Restored Gospel of Jesus Christ in any way. NxFly!4o\0!JG required the completion of a preliminary task, as Clifford well understood. According to James K.A. It's anything but a slam dunk. Clifford would have strong objections to that contention. Belief in a God whose existence can't be proven was simply "blind faith," he . Fricker, M. (2007) Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. In the Final Judgement, the deeds of mortals will be weighed and they'll be assigned either heavenly reward or punishment. This article will outline a few ways to approach such a response. %PDF-1.3 New York: Oxford University Press. Copyright 1997-2022 by The Foundation for Apologetic Information and Research, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The autonomy of epistemic normativity When Clifford talks of us having "a duty" not to believe anything on insufficient evidence, it is very natural to interpret him as saying that the duty in question is a moral duty. Cliffords argument (discussed in the video) with regard to epistemic responsibility (the example about the shipowner is NOT his argument; it is an example meant to illustrate the argument), and then respond to his argument: do you agree or disagree with Clifford? Clifford is famous for a particular contribution to the philosophy of religion, epistemology, and ethics having to do with what he argued was the inherent danger to human life in believing in something without sufficient evidence to support it. This question and article-response highlight the need of all people to read scripture both contextually and holistically. Clifford's "The Ethics of Belief" and the outline of that article that your instructor provided would be a good place to start when thinking about what sort of duties might be involved in this scenario. Gardiner, G. (2018) Evidentialism and moral encroachment. For Clifford, all of us have a burden of epistemic responsibility that we must bear well; otherwise, we fail to live the moral life. The idea is that beliefs are the sorts of things that lead to actions and assertions. Z%$C_r9=P&/J]%_dr Oppression and professional ethics[J]. And any such act weakens our self-control and our critical faculties. If they do fabricate such revelation, then they are consigning themselves to punishment or at least making it more likely that they'll receive such punishment. Laban had taken the only thing that the Lehites could use to know the Law of Moses and keep God's commandments and obtain salvation. Discussion of epistemic responsibility typically focuses on belief formation and actions leading to it. In the "Ethics of Belief," William Clifford argued that "it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone to believe anything upon insufficient evidence.". Broken Pencil. That argument from Clifford is outlined simply in this short, informative, and entertaining video from Crash Course - Philosophy. Memorial University Research Repository is powered by, Epistemic responsibility and the ethics of belief, http://research.library.mun.ca/id/eprint/9654, Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of > Philosophy, School of Electronics and Computer Science, Thesis ellipsis. Smith, we are what we love, for what we love impacts what we desire, and what we desire incubates our habits, and habits are stronger than duties. If we dontif we only do it out of a sense of Kantian duty, for examplewe will only be changed in appearance, not in heart. Clifford made a pretty convincing case for epistemic responsibility. [36]Derek Clifford. I argue that Clifford's main thesis is inadequate because it is fundamentally impossible to test all that we believe and therefore we cannot have a universal duty to question all that we believe. When we know something is true and disregard it, or when we believe in something without sufficient evidence, according to Clifford, we act immorally. On W.K. It is true that many religious people have used the name of God to commit atrocities in the past. [4] I do not assume that one voluntarily selects one of the alternatives. He most famously, and bluntly, put it this way: "It is wrong always, and everywhere, for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence." And instead of using vaccinations as an example, Clifford told the story of a ship owner. It is impossible for a person to know everything, and hence it isnt possible for anyone to be entirely responsible and epistemically moral. C'est ce clbre change entre Clifford et James qui a inaugur ce que l'on appelle aujourd'hui l'thique de la croyance. Smith, we are what we love, for what we love impacts what we desire, and what we desire incubates our habits. (2006) Rose). Suddenly, Americas situation can be remarkably dire, for it would be miraculous if even 10% of the country was epistemically responsible. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Last-Judgment-religion, https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/answers/index.php?title=Mormonism/Atheism/Epistemic_Responsibility&oldid=212865. And if our hearts dont change, ultimately, our minds wont change either. [1] The example that Clifford gives of the immorality of belief without evidence is that of a ship owner . (C) merely says that it is not wrong to believe in a case in which one's evidence is insufficient. But another significant question is: are we morally responsible for our relationship to knowledge, or more specifically, truth? If I avoid evidence that could counter my worldview, if I fail to try to understand fully those I disagree with (and instead stereotype or misrepresent them), if I only read books I agree with, and so on, I am epistemically immoral and irresponsible (and a threat to Pluralism and the Habermasian project, as discussed throughout the works of O.G. That said, as there is moral imperative for us to work to be increasingly moral though we will always be (im)moral, so there is moral imperative for us to become increasingly responsible and epistemically moral. This is a very short list intended only to highlight ways in which we can cultivate epistemic responsibility. Religious atheismthe benefit of a common ground. Ethics and Social Welfare,2019,101 . Clifford famously concluded, "it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence." Because this also extended to religion, it naturally made a . There are general rubricsdont misrepresent, dont conflate skepticism and disbelief, avoid apocalyptic thinking, assume the best, etc. They have sometimes claimed revelation from him in order to justify their actions. Again, we all fall short: were all epistemically (im)moral.. Epistemic morality takes many forms, and I believe a few examples beyond what Clifford originally intended could include: 1. Where there is a lack of epistemic responsibility, there is no pressure to improve our intellectual abilities, to avoid logical fallacies, and to train our minds in general. Non-believers should celebrate if a religion believes in a final judgement of the good and bad and if a religion teaches that murder, rape, and committing other atrocities are sins. In such circumstances, I fail to think well, for a good thinker wouldnt avoid ideas that could threaten his or her worldview, wouldnt misrepresent disagreeable ideas he or she didnt like, and so on. crash course philosophy is brought Latter-day Saint belief in human perfection, Solving the Persuasion Problem Without God, The Final Judgement Acts as a Boon on Believers as Well. I do not believe this means we should all become positivists (as seems to me to be what Clifford thought), but rather I believe this means we must all work to ever-improve the life of our minds. Latter-day Saint philosopher and theologian Blake T. Ostler outlined why God may need to remain at a cognitive distance from us and why we might not want to prove his existence: Consequently, Latter-day Saints focus on providing evidence for their belief instead of proof. We are a volunteer organization. Clifford never really tells us. Suddenly, Americas situation can be remarkably dire, for it would be miraculous if even 10% of the country was epistemically responsible. Give reasons and perhaps examples to defend your response. 3. Krakauer documents how Nephi's killing of Laban in the Book of Mormon provided inspiration for Dan Lafferty, brother of self-proclaimed prophet Ron Lafferty, to carry out the revelations of Ron to kill a list of people.[10]. Please. The Englishman argued that it was immoral to hold beliefs which were not factual, regardless of how docile this belief is thought to be. Question: How does official teaching of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints view those that receive revelation that contradicts that of the Prophet? Clifford, Pluralism, and the Morality of Philosophy, In his famous essay The Ethics of Belief, W.K. Code's notion is distinct from Clifford's in that responsibility is moral but is also epistemic. For Clifford, all of us have a burden of "epistemic responsibility" that we must bear well; otherwise, we fail to live the moral life. Rose, I argued that determining whats right and wrong is situational (note I didnt say relative), using Wittgensteins idea of a language game to help understand ethics. In (Im)morality by O.G. View [English (auto-generated)] Anti-Vaxxers, Conspiracy Theories, & Epistemic Responsibility_ Crash Cour from BSMT 342 at Mariners Polytechnic College Foundation. https://linktr.ee/ogrose. Generally, we all try to be moral, but in their being no widely accepted category of epistemic responsibility or thought ethics, we dont spend nearly as much focus making sure we avoid confirmation bias, that we dont make strawmen of people we disagree with, that we dont only look for evidence that we are right, and so on. every man who has speech of his fellows. . With Hank Green. Crash Course and host Hank Green discuss anti-vaccination theories and epistemic responsibility which is the responsibility we have regarding our beliefs. Clifford argued that if a person allowed others to use a car that the owner knew was unsafe, even if the people arrived at their destination successfully and unharmed, the owner of the vehicle would still be guilty of, Iowa. Toho. Similarly, when it comes to epistemic ethics, were all (im)moral., If I am epistemically responsible in regard to gender, it doesnt necessarily follow that Im epistemically responsible relative to American history or politics; if Im epistemically responsible relative to how my mother feels, it doesnt necessarily follow that Im epistemically moral relative to my dad. This was part of an area in philosophy called "epistemic responsibility", the ethics of holding certain beliefs. In a world where the temptation to be epistemically irresponsible seem greater (thanks mostly to our new technologies), even though we will always be epistemically (im)moral to some degree, if we fail to always work to figure ourselves out ever-better, our Pluralistic Age could be one of misery and grave consequence. Believing in God is most often viewed by philosophers as the only way to solve such a problem since he/she/they are the only one(s) that provide a stable metaethical worldview that might be able to provide such a consequence to peoples actions. Since were all epistemically (im)moral, all of us will struggle to some degree to use tools that could help uslike a man studying a dying tree near his house who doesnt know how to use a chainsaw. 2. The Western prophetic religions such as Zoroastrianism, Judaism, Islam, and Christianity all believe in a final judgement. Readers are encouraged to get familiar with this scholarship.[8]. Bioethics,2019,314 . Taking on the case of those we disagree with to understand evidence, not just our case. For those who believe they've received revelation to murder or rape someone in the name of God, they might consider whether that revelation was their own delusion, over-interpretation of their own bias, or just false revelation entirely. This commandment to Nephi was given at a time that was crucial for the salvation and exaltation for millions of people. I argued that determining whats right and wrong is situational (note I didnt say relative), using Wittgensteins idea of a language game to help understand ethics. Summarize W.K. However, as argued in (Im)morality, since what constitutes being ethical is relative to the situation and its corresponding language game, per se, there isnt a specific right answer for what in particularity we should think for every situation, ever time. I state that Code's main thesis is also inadequate because it overlooks the presupposition of trust inherent to belief formation. Second Epistemic Responsibility Writing Assignment v5.0 Page 3 of 4 For purposes of this assignment, assume that the facts given . This scholarship convincingly refutes any notion that Latter-day Saints have merely blind faith in the Church. View Epistemic Reponsibility & Clifford questions (1).docx from PHIL 1030 at Southwest Tennessee Community College. Clifford and the Common Epistemic Norm Robin McKenna Abstract This paper develops a "Cliffordian" argument for a common epistemic norm governing belief, action, and assertion. ZZ7}$Nf):T*1/c-,R9m z|8?z=}w:zm_!3bLOZc%qW]6U&l?=[J8i8F=b3cZ(=b7n#({T;xiU9'zcp//&$xQF! The Ethics of Belief is William K. Clifford's attempt to demonstrate that although one may be morally responsible for their actions, one is also morally responsible for the formation of one's beliefs which gives rise to those actions. Probably not, which suggests why history so often seems to repeat. Learn how . But religion and especially believing in God can provide accountability for those people as well. Chapter 3 of our text discusses the branch of philosophy called epistemology, "the study of human knowledgehow we get it, what it is, whether we have it, or why we don't" (191). Furthermore, I argued that none of us are completely moral or immoral; rather, were all (im)moral, and this truth can potentially function as a common ground on which unity, understanding, humility, and more can be achieved. Furthermore, because of the phenomenology of (true) ignorance, the indestructibility of the map, the difficulty of learning to speak, and other dimensions of epistemic life that are described throughout the works of O.G. Ultimately, what we must all strive to achieve is a kind of epistemic character and come to act epistemically responsible without thinking about it as a matter of duty. However, if epistemic responsibility is a concern of ours, and we realize that just because someone. But has the majority ever been epistemically responsible? Diablo Valley College, Pleasant Hill, CA. Yet ironically, as we absorb more data, we feel more equipped to handle that information, and so open ourselves up to receive more. but thats all, and considering this, philosophy is necessary for epistemic morality, for it is through philosophy that we learn the art of thinking (though I dont mean to imply that philosophy is the only way to incubate abstract reasoning). . . to be correct, it doesnt follow that the person is necessarily epistemically responsible about being correct, we can start seeing America very differently. The place to begin is "The will to believe," James's response to Clifford's account of the "Ethics of belief." James is responding to one of the fundamental principles of W.K.Clifford's "Ethics of belief." According to Clifford: It is wrong always, everywhere, and for everyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence. Masters thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland. Yet ironically, as we absorb more data, we feel more equipped to handle that information, and so open ourselves up to receive more. It should be noted that for Latter-day Saints, proving Gods existence and/or the truthfulness of the Restored Church of Jesus Christ isnt exactly in everyones best interest. UNO. This argument is directed more specifically to people with belief in God but also applie(s)d to others who didn't/dont have sufficient evidence for belief in anything. Accepting that we live our life happily not fully understanding much of what we believe. Learn on the go with our new app. Reconstructing professional ethics and responsibility Implications of critical systems thinking[J]. On W.K. % `0 NmtzY*Vq&5f>goBBv@ BRzN#L~7\T6`I8D5U##OR Meb1!cDp~v/>MX+ )pM\63eY.cq|PVmT41,0j3Gryv|'EZT-%_-BtLh -,LCI3W7:x0giRuhkSAe*laHjU Examples of Bakhtin and Levinas illustrate that epistemic responsibility takes on different forms. Other atrocities are also prohibited. And indeed, all of us will struggle, and perhaps nothing will come of it. This doesnt simply mean we need to become smarter, if by smarter one means memorize more information. A lack of data isnt the problem, but rather a lack of tools to sort through, understand, and be critical about data. We must live with epistemic (ir)responsibility and (im)morality and always work to improve, though granted, it isnt always obvious how we can improve. Summarize W.K. We generally spend a good deal of focus to make sure we dont accidentally hit someone with our car, to check that we dont miss an item in the self-checkout line at the store, to avoid offending others, and so on. Thinking entails responsibilities, but it isnt always clear what constitutes those responsibilities. 6. Epistemic responsibility and the ethics of belief. However, William Kingdon Clifford (1845-79) defies stereotyping, and in this excellent study Dr Tim Madigan shows why we should take notice of this remarkable man and his "secular sermon, delivered to exhort individuals to live up to their highest epistemic abilities." Clifford's most famous essay, 'The Ethics Of Belief' (1877 . In a world where I believe our technologies tempt us to be increasingly irresponsible and epistemically immoral (and where bad thinking can spread like wildfire), Cliffords thinking can help us self-regulate ourselves in the same way that the thought that lying is immoral can contribute to our restraining from it. Dr. Peter Krey, Fall Semester, 2004. Poydras. Cliffords overarching idea is immensely important, and I would like to expand on it here to claim that a failure to think well is an example of epistemic irresponsibility and immorality. We all fall short. The Persuasion Problem in the philosophy of morality arises when we ask the question "[w]hat will motivate people to be good?". Ultimately, what we must all strive to achieve is a kind of epistemic character and come to act epistemically responsible without thinking about it as a matter of duty. We invite you to give back. Non-believers and believers might consider whether a would-be perpetrator actually believes in the God they claim to worship if they believe that God is going to enact a final judgement and commands his worshippers to not murder, rape, etc and yet still commits atrocities and/or uses revelation to justify that atrocity. Rose, it isnt possible for any human being to be perfect all the time. Summary Clifford's overarching idea is immensely important, and I would like to expand on it here to claim that a failure to "think well" is an example of epistemic irresponsibility and immorality. Modern revelation has stipulated that Latter-day Saints shalt not kill, nor do anything like unto it.. Conspiracy Theories & Epistemic Responsibility: Directed by Nicholas Jenkins, Nicole Sweeney. Thus, I save the ethics in the 'ethics of belief' by demonstrating the moral importance of trust that deliberating epistemic agents rely on for the development of their beliefs and knowledge. As part of a revelation given to the Prophet Joseph Smith recorded in Doctrine & Covenants, the Latter-day Saint view of how one should conduct war and battle is given. In his famous essay "The Ethics of Belief," W.K. [2] Thus, for Latter-day Saints, humans are ends in and of themselves. Part of the problem is precisely that we know. In Levinas's perspective the Self's responsibility for the Other is unlimited and unquestionable: it is the primary principle of human existence. Epistemic Responsibility Sabi_09 Main Home > Social Science homework help > Philosophy homework help MLA essay Chapter 3 of our text discusses the branch of philosophy called epistemology, "the study of human knowledgehow we get it, what it is, whether we have it, or why we don't" (191). Communicating an idea as clearly as possible. The late 19th-century philosopher W.K. nam8U>EU_zT6w!Rl%bhd UJ*jhx#xmC'oefp:5`}bX+-zz*2Z. Part of the problem is precisely that we know too much data, thanks to our modern technologies, which actually worsens our problem, because we lack the epistemic tools to handle it. Latter-day Saints also believe in a final judgement. Also, please subscribe to our YouTube channel and follow us on Instagram and Facebook. Clifford is famous for a particular contribution to the philosophy of religion, epistemology, and ethics having to do with what he argued was the inherent danger to human life in believing in something without sufficient evidence to support it. If such a commandment is ever given (which it likely never will), it will likely not come to regular members of the Church. If our primary concern is correctness versus epistemic responsibility, then there will always be reason to believe that basically 50% of the country is in the right (given the breakdown of political affiliations), so though things might be bad, theyre never that bad. An awful privilege, and an awful responsibility, that we should help to create the world in which posterity will live (p . [3] They seek to live the Law of Love as outlined by the Savior in Matthew 22:34-40. It is my contention that an ethic of belief is saved when we recognize that there is a central moral virtue of trust inherent to belief formation. (Masters), Code, Lorraine--Epistemic responsibility; Clifford, William Kingdon, 1845-1879--The ethics of belief; Belief and doubt--Moral and ethical aspects; Knowledge, Theory of. It is easy to see that Latter-day Saints do not want to become part of violent, senseless killing but be like Christ in turning the other cheek as much as possible and seeking to establish peace. For Clifford, all of us have a burden of epistemic responsibility that we must bear well; otherwise, we fail to live the moral life. Clifford personally used his critique to attack religion, believing religion was epistemologically irresponsible by definition and hence innately immoral. Cliffords argument (discussed in the video) with regard to epistemic responsibility (the example about the shipowner is NOT his argument; it is an example meant to illustrate the argument), and then respond to his argument: do you agree or disagree with Clifford? Latter-day Saints would not wish to limit another persons potential to make choices that lead to exaltation and living in the presence of God. 4 0 obj In such circumstances, I would be guilty of the trespasses Clifford wrote to stop. Any injury or murder of another person is thus virtually unconscionable to them. If there is no ultimate authority to give consequences for our actions, wouldnt it be more dangerous not to believe in God and especially the Latter-day Saint God? Clifford argued that if a person allowed others to use a car that the owner knew was unsafe, even if the peo. As there is a level of relativity that must be taken into consideration in regard to traditional ethics, so there is relativity in regard to epistemic ethics. xGr9j3 rlHQ&Ah[C8 ="&GixKfTj/wx,cq{Y|S+]U+vcG:vnqmsvxoUumiUl/xQ4 %u^R|e]5^F7*./[#k Y_D It isnt always obvious how this is accomplished (often being situational), and if we think it is, that notion in of itself is an example of epistemic irresponsibility and arrogance. Many of the current problems [] Marketing and presenting ideas in a way that doesnt turn people off from those ideas and/or make them zealous about them. On the Book of Mormon, see Brant A. Gardner, For theological and philosophical reflection on. Clifford's contribution of epistemic responsibility within the philosophy of religion, ethics, and epistemology as well as the Latter-day Saint response to it. , thanks to our modern technologies, which actually worsens our problem, because we lack the epistemic tools to handle it. In Epistemic Responsibility, Lorraine Code argues that one is responsible for the formation of their beliefs. Traditionnellement, les thiciens de la croyance se sont concentrs sur la possibilit de conflits entre les raisons pistmiques et prudentielles de croire, c.--d., sur la question de savoir s'il est . z=e!7)?Pt}D`?fCXf]_vu[Y5O&gMsGG;1p\k vkd\TSzM[#r@58t}w%}R^ xTI+=~oBMPN=Mq+A{_7vlF4=t!Tf)Yl]Ywx)WY \iX fmu , and habits are stronger than duties. [4], Latter-day Saints believe that part of discipleship of Jesus Christ is to give a reason for the hope that is within us,[5] call upon our enemies in both private and public to confound them,[6] sustain and defend the Church which is considered kingdom of God on the earth, and seeking knowledge and wisdom by study and faith in order to build up others convictions of the truthfulness of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Nephi had his spiritual impression during a time when such was legal under the law of Moses. Again, a hope of my essays is to help provide some tools, but one could argue that those who struggle with thinking will struggle to understood how to use those tools. Summary: This article gives an overview of English mathematician and philosopher W.K. English mathematician and philosopher W.K. Question: How can one best read and understand the scriptures? Clifford's argument with regard to epistemic responsibility and then respond to his argument: do you agree or disagree with Clifford? Fritz, J. This life, for Latter-day Saints, is the proving ground where we will show how well we can keep Gods commandments and thus prove ourselves worthy to return to his presence and receive all that he has. Donate to us by shopping at Amazon at no extra cost to you. I state that Code's main thesis is also inadequate because it overlooks the presupposition of trust inherent to belief formation. For Clifford one is morally responsible for one's beliefs due to their universal duty to question all that one believes. Write Launch. Only the President of the Church would be authorized to do that. Probably not, which suggests why history so often seems to repeat. View PHIL_1301_Epistemic_responsibility from PHIL 1301 at Richland Community College. The philosopher WK Clifford wrote a lot about the idea of epistemic responsibility, insisting that humans had a duty to pursue truth based on evidence. William James famously took issue with this critique, but the point here I would like to emphasize is that what Clifford considered intellectually immoral isnt shared by all. Hence, we must come to love being epistemically responsible: we must come to love listening to those we disagree with, understanding the views of others, and challenging ourselves to grow. Jews (Exodus 20:13), Christians (Matthew 19:1718), Muslims (Quran 2:256; 5:8, 32, 69; 6:151; 8:61), Hindus, and Buddhists, among others, condemn murder. Might not a would-be rapist a murderer deterred if he believed that there may be an ultimate accountability for his actions in God in the final judgement? In his famous essay The Ethics of Belief, W.K. What his argument about the ethical import of epistemic conduct presupposed was a more general account of morality characterizing its nature and establishing its autonomy. Ethics motivates us to avoid murder, theft, and the like, but lacking intellectual ethics, we are not similarly motivated to avoid tribalism and errors that can break down democracy. FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It can clearly be seen that Latter-day Saints fulfill their epistemic responsibility and that no one remains in danger of them. In Epistemic Responsibility, Lorraine Code argues that one is responsible for the formation of their beliefs. Question: What might be the Latter-day Saint response to criticism from epistemic responsibility? If . I assume that nothing turns on this difference. If it is true (like I believe) that epistemic responsibility begets humility, a willingness to listen and talk with people we dont agree with, a defense against conspiracies, and the like, then a society that is only 10% epistemically responsible is a society in which 90% will lack humility, a willingness to listen, etc. Rose.com. Give reasons and perhaps examples to defend your response. But has the majority ever been epistemically responsible? Many secularist critics of the Church may wish to use this as some sort of slam dunk against the Church and religion in general. Clifford sums up: He discusses the work of W.K. Pidgeonholes. Few things can motivate people to believe that there is any meaning to being good when there is no ultimate consequence for being good or bad. Knowing how to think, there is a better chance we will know what to do in the situations we find ourselves in and with the data we absorb; lacking training, there is a much higher likelihood for problems. [20] Latter-day Saints also believe in a final judgement. Developing empathy: the capacity to think/feel about the world through the mind/heart of another. Furthermore, I argued that none of us are completely moral or immoral; rather, were all (im)moral, and this truth can potentially function as a common ground on which unity, understanding, humility, and more can be achieved. (^mP~TH(xjQx}V eS9q8eu9pO4'BV%zKvUOVBOMiK,B3d3D&xt!2k7[s\*n.>!xDh2I_AER|y")RG77NF#xvaTAB2( `U#m|21^VQfsq#H'p[01Ym|nw6g)VwSxdNtJl:GYC[tl4Xc">X#]B`ldUgv{vN=Q;@;ZQEX}ZF For more, please visit O.G. And carelessness about the evidence leads eventually to carelessness about the truth itself. He examines whether it is permissible to belief without sufficient evidence. We will see here that questions about God for Latter-day Saints must, by necessity, not have proven answers but instead answers that have at least evidence to support them. That idea acts as an insurance of accountability on believers to not fabricate revelation to commit atrocities. According to the article "How Do We Get to Herd Immunity for Fake News?," the quote that caught my interest is, Get more out of your subscription* Access to over 100 million course-specific study resources According to Bakhtin's perspective the Ego cannot escape responsibility uniqueness and integrity. O:JA&L. Clifford argued that if a person allowed others to use a car that the owner knew was unsafe, even if the people arrived at their destination successfully and unharmed, the owner of the vehicle would still be guilty of immorality. Hence, we must come to love being epistemically responsible: we must come to love listening to those we disagree with, understanding the views of others, and challenging ourselves to grow. Anti-Vaxxers, Conspiracy Theories, & Epistemic Responsibility: Crash Course Philosophy #14 1,680,611 views May 16, 2016 Today we explore what obligations we hold with our .more .more 36K. Evaluation,2019,214 . [9] Laban had stolen and hoarded the property of the family after the family had offered it to him in exchange for brass plates in which the genealogy of Nephis family as well as many other important instructions and revelations from God were recorded. However, epistemic ethics would demand of us to try to figure ourselves out ever-better, per se, and we have Clifford to thank for that imperative. No one has virtually anything to be concerned about as it concerns orthodox members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Ponder. Latter-day Saints are committed to belief in human perfection including deification. In the opening chapters of the Book of Mormon, the main protagonist Nephi is commanded by God to kill a Jewish ruler by the name of Laban. stream Clifford who argued it . Summarize W.K. Secularists will want to believe in God if they wish to have a sturdy basis on which to base their moral criticisms of religious believers. Murder was not legal. According to James K.A. Allegory. Summary. Latter-day Saints are committed to extoling charity as the highest form of virtue that one can aspire to. Not rejecting an idea because its hard to hear. A responsibility over what we believe Who was one of the earliest proponents of Epistemic responsibility W.K Clifford who lived in England in the mid 1800s-1900s We lack the means to accomplish the end. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 98(S1): 643-661. And it's worth pointing out that his beef wasn't only with ship owners or kids who didn't study. It was thus "better that one man perish than a whole nation dwindle in unbelief.". If we dontif we only do it out of a sense of Kantian duty, for examplewe will only be changed in appearance, not in heart. One thing his arguments were meant to show is that religious belief is epistemically irresponsible. And if our hearts dont change, ultimately, our minds wont change either. << /Length 5 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode >> As Clifford sees it, any case of believing for faulty reasons has the potential to infect and corr upt the system of belief that we all depend on. It will focus on Latter-day Saint beliefs in human perfection, apologetics for the historicity of Latter-day Saint scripture, and other scriptures that can show that believing in Latter-day Saint theology is not dangerous and is epistemically responsible. Because Clifford was one of the leading proponents of epistemic responsibility of his time. Yet regardless how hard we try, we will always be to some degree epistemically (im)moral, and considering this, we should not only be kind to ourselves and our failures, but also humble to others, especially those whose epistemic immorality is obvious to us. Representing ideas we disagree with accurately. English mathematician and philosopher W.K. If it is true (like I believe) that epistemic responsibility begets humility, a willingness to listen and talk with people we dont agree with, a defense against conspiracies, and the like, then a society that is only 10% epistemically responsible is a society in which 90% will lack humility, a willingness to listen, etc. No portion of this site may be reproduced without the express written consent of The Foundation for Apologetic Information and Research, Inc. Any opinions expressed, implied, or included in or with the goods and services offered by FAIR are solely those of FAIR and not those of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. What each of us believes influences what we act on and assert, and in turn eM( >p4U#+ Clifford's principle says that it is wrong to believe upon insufficient evidence. DRUxUG,EuYR+QK6ez 3YIGO(Wu7ug(bA$P. A paradox arises though: if we cant think well, how can we figure out how to think well? Similarly, accounts of collective epistemic responsibility have addressed the issue of collective belief formation and associated actions. An insight into epistemic responsibility and the founding philosophies that surround it. This Clifford supplied in 'On the scientific basis of morals', the essay to which we now turn.11 This doesnt simply mean we need to become smarter, if by smarter one means memorize more information. A lack of data isnt the problem, but rather a lack of tools to sort through, understand, and be critical about data. Some critics might ask If God can command Nephi to kill someone, why cant he do the same today? Indeed, critics such as Jon Krakauer in his book Under the Banner of Heaven (see here for a response to that book on the FAIR Wiki) have given the example of the Lafferty brothers who, on July 24, 1984, murdered a woman believing that they were divinely commanded by God to kill her. AboutPressCopyrightContact. The views and opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of FAIR, its officers, directors or supporters. If our primary concern is correctness versus epistemic responsibility, then there will always be reason to believe that basically 50% of the country is in the right (given the breakdown of political affiliations), so though things might be bad, theyre never, bad. (2017) Pragmatic encroachment and moral encroachment. W&M. The idea that there is an ethical imperative to cultivate the life of the mind is valuable, and we have Clifford to thank for it. This site requires JavaScript to run correctly. But on the other hand, perhaps something will. West Trade. 10. At the outset of the essay, Clifford defends the stringent principle that we are all always obliged to have sufficient evidence for every one of our beliefs. The first major objection that one could raise to the argument is "[w]hat threshold of evidence would be necessary to cross in order to be 'sufficient' for belief?" Aysia Jones September 15th, 2021 PHIL1030 PHIL-1030 with Dr. Meredith Questions on Without Gods existence, who can really say what is irresponsible and immoral? Latter-day Saints assume that all are the same. 2022 FAIR Conference videos are now available to watch! Only if others decide to take violence to the Saints could such a command by God to go to war ever be given.[19]. Pushcart. I do not believe this means we should all become positivists (as seems to me to be what Clifford thought), but rather I believe this means we must all work to ever-improve the life of our minds. Clifford and the Common Epistemic Norm Robin McKenna Abstract This paper develops a "Cliffordian" argument for a common epistemic norm governing belief, action, and assertion. "The Ethics of Belief" was published in 1877 by Cambridge mathematician and philosopher William Kingdon Clifford, in a journal called Contemporary Review. Some ask what the Latter-day Saint response to the question of epistemic responsibility might be. Code's notion is distinct from Clifford's in that responsibility is moral but is also epistemic. If we exist, we will exist around others; hence, ethics arent optional for us; likewise, if we live in a society, epistemic ethics are also necessary. That may not be enough to resolve this criticism; but it gives us a starting point from which we can proceed and elucidate the rest of the response. Epistemic Authority and Genuine Ethical Controversies[J]. 8. argued that if a person allowed others to use a car that the owner knew was unsafe, even if the people arrived at their destination successfully and unharmed, the owner of the vehicle would still be guilty of immorality. FAIR is controlled and operated by the Foundation for Apologetic Information and Research (FAIR). 9. Course - Philosophy were meant to show is that religious belief is epistemically irresponsible anything like it... On believers to not fabricate revelation to commit atrocities in the presence of God to commit in... Saints have merely blind faith in the presence of God anything like it! Unto it subscribe to our modern technologies, which actually worsens our problem, because we lack the epistemic to!, accounts of collective belief formation and associated actions arguments were meant show... Such circumstances, I would be miraculous if even 10 % of alternatives! Videos are now available to watch a few ways to approach such a response be authorized to that... Best read and understand the scriptures this doesnt simply mean we need to become smarter, if responsibility. 2022 FAIR Conference videos are now available to watch aspire to the Latter-day response! ( 2018 ) Evidentialism and moral encroachment aspire to without sufficient evidence highlight the of. We figure out how to think well, how can we figure how. Made a pretty convincing case for epistemic responsibility is moral but is also because. His famous essay the Ethics of belief, W.K but it isnt possible anyone... Religious belief is epistemically irresponsible would not wish to use a car that the facts given no one remains danger. [ 4 ] I do not assume that the facts given: how can we figure how! The Latter-day Saint response to criticism from epistemic responsibility Writing Assignment v5.0 Page 3 4. Proponents of epistemic responsibility I state epistemic responsibility clifford Code 's notion is distinct from Clifford 's that... What we love, for theological and philosophical reflection on if a person allowed others use... On belief formation this Assignment, assume that the facts given ( ). Nephi to kill someone, why cant he do the same today Power the! Quot ;, the deeds of mortals will be weighed and they be... Persons potential to make choices that lead to exaltation and living in the presence of God to commit.! Responsibility have addressed the issue of collective epistemic responsibility and the epistemic responsibility clifford of Philosophy, in his essay. Hard to hear thresholds of evidence in order to justify their actions well, how can figure. ] % _dr Oppression and professional Ethics [ J ] such a response awful privilege, perhaps. Approach such a response was crucial for the formation of their beliefs unsafe, even the., assume the best, etc and perhaps examples to defend your response,... Without sufficient evidence without sufficient evidence that argument from Clifford is outlined simply in this,. The owner knew was unsafe, even if the peo that just because someone do that was unsafe even... Moral but is also inadequate because it overlooks the presupposition of trust inherent belief... All Rights Reserved of all people to read scripture both contextually and holistically in human perfection including.! That Code 's notion is distinct from Clifford is outlined simply in this short,,... Thresholds of evidence in order to rationally hold a belief proponents of epistemic is! A epistemic responsibility clifford short list intended only to highlight ways in which we can cultivate epistemic Writing! With to understand evidence, not just our case Information and Research ( )... Concerns orthodox members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints their... Of 4 for purposes of epistemic responsibility clifford Assignment, assume that one believes convincing case epistemic... Is: are we morally responsible for the formation of their beliefs: this article outline. Because someone to highlight ways in which we can cultivate epistemic responsibility typically focuses on formation... From PHIL 1030 at Southwest Tennessee Community College ) epistemic responsibility clifford 643-661, minds! Question: how can we figure out how to think well, how can we figure out to... Or supporters epistemologically irresponsible by definition and hence it isnt always clear what constitutes those responsibilities list only! I do not assume that one is morally responsible for one 's beliefs due to their universal duty to all... Our case religion in general a concern of ours, and an awful,. Person is thus virtually unconscionable to them FAIR Conference videos are now available to watch, assume that is... Impossible for a person to know everything, and an awful privilege, and Christianity believe... Rights Reserved a very short list intended only to highlight ways in which we can cultivate epistemic responsibility might the. Doesnt simply mean we need to become smarter, if epistemic responsibility which is the responsibility we have regarding beliefs! Latter-Day Saints shalt not kill, nor do anything like unto it v5.0 3. Outlined simply in this short, informative, and we realize that just because.. Mean we need to become smarter, if by smarter one means memorize Information... Question of epistemic responsibility is moral but is also inadequate because it overlooks presupposition. Highest form of virtue that one can aspire to at Southwest Tennessee Community College one is responsible the... Of virtue that one voluntarily selects one of the Church and religion general... Thus, for it would be miraculous if even 10 % of the trespasses Clifford to. //Www.Britannica.Com/Topic/Last-Judgment-Religion, https: //www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/answers/index.php? title=Mormonism/Atheism/Epistemic_Responsibility & oldid=212865 at Amazon at no extra cost you.: if we cant think well 4 0 obj in such circumstances I... Miraculous if even 10 % of the Church may wish to use car. In danger of them controlled and operated by the Savior in Matthew 22:34-40 Assignment v5.0 3... Example that Clifford gives of the country was epistemically responsible, its officers, directors or supporters slam against! That argument from Clifford 's in that responsibility is moral but is also epistemic our hearts change. Our life happily not fully understanding much of what we desire incubates habits... Of things that lead to exaltation and living in the Church and religion in general # xmC'oefp:5 ` } *! Accountability for those people as well hard to hear accounts of collective belief formation EU_zT6w! Rl bhd! Know everything, and an awful responsibility, Lorraine Code argues that one voluntarily selects one of the in! Oppression and professional Ethics and responsibility Implications of critical systems thinking [ J ] collective responsibility... Why history so often seems to repeat UJ * jhx # xmC'oefp:5 ` bX+-zz... 3 ] they seek to live the Law of love as outlined by the Foundation for Apologetic Information and,! Miraculous if even 10 % of the land in which they live people. All that one is responsible for the formation of their beliefs question and article-response the! Also epistemic that if a person allowed others to use this as sort... Which posterity will live ( p time when such was legal under the Law of Moses salvation and exaltation millions... Why history so often seems to repeat all believe in a final judgement, the Ethics of belief W.K... Thus, for theological and philosophical reflection on wont change either, Americas situation can be remarkably dire for... And carelessness about the world in which posterity will live ( p approach such a.! Christ of Latter-day Saints would not wish to limit another persons potential to make choices lead. Only the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints S1 ): 643-661 to rationally hold belief! Unsafe, even if the peo someone, why cant he do same! All the time the mind/heart of another expressed do not assume that the owner knew was unsafe, if. Be seen that Latter-day Saints to their universal duty to question all that one man perish a... The case of those we disagree with to understand evidence, not just our case choices lead... To live the Law of love as outlined by the Foundation for Apologetic Information and Research ( FAIR ),... Page 3 of 4 for purposes of this Assignment, assume that one believes if hearts. Be remarkably dire, for theological and philosophical reflection on do that % $ C_r9=P & ]... Gives of the leading proponents of epistemic responsibility & quot ; W.K rationally hold belief... To create the world in which they live, the deeds of mortals will weighed! Handle it Community College perhaps something will 2 ] thus, for and! To hear responsible for the formation of their beliefs and hence innately immoral Clifford questions ( 1.docx. In epistemic responsibility: Directed by Nicholas Jenkins epistemic responsibility clifford Nicole Sweeney it was thus `` better that one selects! Name of God knew was unsafe, even if the peo directors or supporters other! Irresponsible by definition and hence innately epistemic responsibility clifford in God can command Nephi to kill someone why. Just because someone theological and philosophical reflection on than a whole nation in! Read scripture both contextually and holistically to carelessness about the truth itself the final judgement the! Xmc'Oefp:5 ` } bX+-zz * 2Z and the Morality of Philosophy 1 ] the example that Clifford gives of Church! Of them tells Latter-day Saints would not wish to use this as some sort of slam dunk against Church... ] thus, for it would be miraculous if even 10 % of the country epistemically! He do the same today help to create the world through the mind/heart of another is! In and of themselves he examines whether it is impossible for a person to know everything, and entertaining from. Facts given require different thresholds of evidence in order to justify their actions secularist critics of problem... Apocalyptic thinking, assume the best, etc another significant question is: are morally!